Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Effects of vegetation differ among three species of fiddler crabs (Uca spp.)

Nobbs, M (2003). Effects of vegetation differ among three species of fiddler crabs (Uca spp.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,284(1-2):41-50.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 35 times in Scopus Article | Citations

Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

Title Effects of vegetation differ among three species of fiddler crabs (Uca spp.)
Author Nobbs, M
Journal Name Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Publication Date 2003
Volume Number 284
Issue Number 1-2
ISSN 0022-0981   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-0037471579
Start Page 41
End Page 50
Total Pages 10
Place of Publication Amsterdam, Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier Science
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract In the mid-upper intertidal zone of Australian mangrove communities, Uca flammula (Crane), Uca signata (Hess) and Uca elegans (George and Jones) live in forest, edge and clearing habitats, respectively, and sesarmids are abundant in forest habitats. To examine why some species associate with, while others avoid vegetated habitats, three physical features that create spatial variation in vegetation cover were experimentally decoupled in the field: i.e. (1) shade cover, (2) above-ground structure and (3) below ground structure. Shade, but not above or below ground structure, significantly affected crab counts. Uca signata, U. flammula and sesarmids invaded shaded treatments; U. elegans avoided them. This suggests that vegetation does not provide structural support for crab burrows or a refuge from predators. Compared to the other species, U. elegans most often employs visual signals and may avoid vegetated habitats because they hinder visibility. The other crabs may benefit from the less stressful conditions found under plant cover as shaded plots were wetter and cooler than exposed plots. Sesarmids may have positive and negative effects on Uca distribution because they harass and sometimes kill Uca, yet their burrowing and feeding activities may have numerous benefits such as enriching the soil. Uca elegans, and possibly U. signata, may avoid living within forests because their waving behaviour during mating makes them conspicuous to predators. The loss of visual signals to attract females may enable U. flammula to successfully co-habitat with sesarmids.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00488-4   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 114 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 12 Sep 2008, 08:35:25 CST by Administrator