Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Can human rights discourse improve the health of indigenous australians?

Gray, N. and Bailie, Ross S. (2006). Can human rights discourse improve the health of indigenous australians?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,30(5):448-452.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 10005xPUB75
Title Can human rights discourse improve the health of indigenous australians?
Author Gray, N.
Bailie, Ross S.
Journal Name Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publication Date 2006
Volume Number 30
Issue Number 5
ISSN 1326-0200   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 448
End Page 452
Total Pages 5
Place of Publication Australia
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
Field of Research 1117 - Public Health and Health Services
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract Objective: Recognition of the poor health outcomes of Indigenous Australians has led to an interest in using human rights discourse as a framework for arguing that the Australian Government has an international obligation to improve Indigenous health.

Method: This paper explores two potential directions for human rights discourse in this context. The first is the development and elaboration of an asserted 'human right to health'. The second focuses on developing an understanding of the interactions between health and human rights, particularly the underlying social determinants of health, and thereby creating an advocacy framework that could be used to promote the inclusion of human rights considerations into the policy-making agenda.

Results: This paper argues that despite the symbolic force of human rights discourse, its capacity to improve the health of Indigenous Australians through international law is limited. This is so irrespective of whether recourse is made to a legal or moral imperative.

Conclusion and Implications: The 'human right to health' is limited primarily by several barriers to its implementation, some of which are perpetuated by the current Australian Government itself. Although the potential advocacy capacity of human rights discourse is similarly limited by the hostility of the Government towards the notion of incorporating human rights considerations into its public policy decision making, it does provide a sustainable intellectual framework in which to consider the social and structural determinants of health and maintain these issues on the political agenda.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00462.x   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 55 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 12 Sep 2008, 08:35:25 CST by Administrator