Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, Bruce M., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. and Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. In Walker, B. H., Anderies, J. M., Kiinzig, A. P. and Ryan, P.(Ed.), Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Comparative Studies and Theory Development. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing. (pp. 119-138).

Document type: Book Chapter
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID A00002xPUB5
Author Lebel, L.
Anderies, J. M.
Campbell, Bruce M.
Folke, C.
Hatfield-Dodds, S.
Hughes, T.
Wilson, J.
Title of Chapter Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
Title of Book Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Comparative Studies and Theory Development
Place of Publication Canberra
Publisher CSIRO Publishing
Publication Year 2006
Series Ecology and Society, Special Issue
Edition 1
Editor Walker, B. H.
Anderies, J. M.
Kiinzig, A. P.
Ryan, P.
ISBN 9780643092433   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Volume Number Volume 11, Issue 1, Article 19
Start Page 119
End Page 138
Total Pages 20
Field of Research 0502 - Environmental Science and Management
1402 - Applied Economics
HERDC Category B - Book Chapter (DEST)
Abstract The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 83 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 12 Sep 2008, 08:35:25 CST by Administrator