Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Feasibility and costs of water fluoridation in remote Australian Aboriginal communities

Ehsani, Jonathan P. and Bailie, Ross (2007). Feasibility and costs of water fluoridation in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. BMC Public Health,7(1):100-107.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Ehsani_24378.pdf Published version application/pdf 247.34KB 525
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

Title Feasibility and costs of water fluoridation in remote Australian Aboriginal communities
Author Ehsani, Jonathan P.
Bailie, Ross
Journal Name BMC Public Health
Publication Date 2007
Volume Number 7
Issue Number 1
ISSN 1471-2458   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 100
End Page 107
Total Pages 8
Place of Publication United Kingdom
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd.
Abstract Background: Fluoridation of public water supplies remains the key potential strategy for prevention of dental caries. The water supplies of many remote Indigenous communities do not contain adequate levels of natural fluoride. The small and dispersed nature of communities presents challenges for the provision of fluoridation infrastructure and until recently smaller settlements were considered unfavourable for cost-effective water fluoridation. Technological advances in water treatment and fluoridation are resulting in new and more cost-effective water fluoridation options and recent cost analyses support water fluoridation for communities of less than 1,000 people.

Methods: Small scale fluoridation plants were installed in two remote Northern Territory communities in early 2004. Fluoride levels in community water supplies were expected to be monitored by local staff and by a remote electronic system. Site visits were undertaken by project investigators at commissioning and approximately two years later. Interviews were conducted with key informants and documentation pertaining to costs of the plants and operational reports were reviewed.

Results: The fluoridation plants were operational for about 80% of the trial period. A number of technical features that interfered with plant operation were identified and addressed though redesign. Management systems and the attitudes and capacity of operational staff also impacted on the effective functioning of the plants. Capital costs for the wider implementation of these plants in remote communities is estimated at about $US94,000 with recurrent annual costs of $US11,800 per unit.

Conclusion: Operational issues during the trial indicate the need for effective management systems, including policy and funding responsibility. Reliable manufacturers and suppliers of equipment should be identified and contractual agreements should provide for ongoing technical assistance. Water fluoridation units should be considered as a potential priority component of health related infrastructure in at least the larger remote Indigenous communities which have inadequate levels of natural fluoride and high levels of dental caries.
Keywords water fluoridation
feasibility and costs
remote communities
Aboriginal Australians
DOI   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)

© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact

Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 215 Abstract Views, 542 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 23 Oct 2012, 10:14:57 CST by Teresa Haendel