Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Eradications and People: Lessons from the Plant Eradications Program in Galapagos

Gardener, Mark R., Atkinson, Rachel and Rentería, Jorge Luis (2010). Eradications and People: Lessons from the Plant Eradications Program in Galapagos. Restoration Ecology,18(1):20-29.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 29 times in Scopus Article | Citations

Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 81704288xPUB465
Title Eradications and People: Lessons from the Plant Eradications Program in Galapagos
Author Gardener, Mark R.
Atkinson, Rachel
Rentería, Jorge Luis
Journal Name Restoration Ecology
Publication Date 2010
Volume Number 18
Issue Number 1
ISSN 1061-2971   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-73949141490
Start Page 20
End Page 29
Total Pages 10
Place of Publication United States
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract It is often argued that the benefit of eradication of an invasive species-a one-off injection of funds and the problem is solved-far outweighs the cost of a perennial control program. Furthermore, these are very attractive projects for funding agencies as outcomes are clear and easy to assess. Galapagos is in the early stage of the invasion process, with most alien species not yet naturalized and still restricted to gardens and farms. These species should be easy targets for early and cost-effective eradication projects, which would prevent many future problems. We review 30 plant eradication projects covering 23 potentially invasive species with limited distributions on four of the Galapagos Islands. Of the 30 projects, only four were successful: these were all less than 1 ha in net area, on land with a single owner and did not have persistent seed banks. Of the other 26 projects, most failed due to a lack of support from institutions that did not offer continuity of resources, from land owners who denied permission to carry out the work or from being too ambitious. As a result of these problems, 64.3% of the funding secured for the program was spent on discontinued projects. We highlight lessons learned to inform plant eradication programs in the future.
Keywords cost
eradication
failure
invasive
island
Rubus niveus
stakeholder participation
weed
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00614.x   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 25 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 17 Jan 2014, 00:37:22 CST