Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Is Bentham's vision of a comprehensive criminal code suitable as a model design for a code?

Hemming, Andrew George (2013). Is Bentham's vision of a comprehensive criminal code suitable as a model design for a code?. PhD Thesis, Charles Darwin University.

Document type: Thesis
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Thesis_CDU_38905_Hemming_A.pdf PDF version generated by student application/pdf 3.57MB 1024
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

Author Hemming, Andrew George
Title Is Bentham's vision of a comprehensive criminal code suitable as a model design for a code?
Institution Charles Darwin University
Publication Date 2013
Thesis Type PhD
Subjects 1801 - Law
1899 - Other Law and Legal Studies
Abstract This thesis question examines whether Jeremy Bentham’s concept of a criminal code having ‘no blank spaces’, thereby minimising the role of the common law and judicial interpretation, is first, desirable and secondly, achievable. Desirability and achievability are clearly interwoven. The disparity between the theory that a code should be internally self-consistent and self-sufficient with the practice that ‘inevitable ambiguities of language make this impossible’ is a central theme. The thesis seeks to test whether the latter statement can be overcome. An alternative way of considering the central question is to examine whether Bentham’s vision of the legislature clearly stating its intentions sufficient for the ordinary citizen to fully comprehend his or her criminal liability is beyond the capacity of any criminal code architect in the 21st century. A criminal code should be as comprehensive as practicable in its description of rules of conduct. Second, it must communicate those rules effectively to the general public. Australian Criminal Codes will be evaluated against these two criteria. The Model Criminal Code which became Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code (Cth) is the most ‘Benthamite’ Criminal Code in Australia, and has been taken up by both the Australian Capital Territory in 2002 and the Northern Territory in 2006. As such the Model Criminal Code can be compared to the ‘Griffith’ Codes of Queensland (1899), Western Australia (1902) and Tasmania (1924). The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is presented as the best example of a Benthamite Code in the 19th century. Building on Macauley’s work on the IPC, it is argued that the development in criminal law theory since Bentham’s death in 1832, most notably the U.S. Model Penal Code in 1962 and the Model Criminal Code in Australia in 1992, leave open the possibility that Bentham’s vision is more achievable today than in Bentham’s own era.

© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact

Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 172 Abstract Views, 1024 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 26 May 2014, 11:44:51 CST