Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Capacity Constraints and the Job Guarantee

Mitchell, William and Watts, Martin (2013). Capacity Constraints and the Job Guarantee. In: 14th Path to Full Employment Conference and 19th National Conference on Unemployment, University of Newcastle, 4-5 December 2013.

Document type: Conference Paper
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Mitchell_40225.pdf Published version application/pdf 556.38KB 239
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

IRMA ID 84279116xPUB81
Author Mitchell, William
Watts, Martin
Title Capacity Constraints and the Job Guarantee
Conference Name 14th Path to Full Employment Conference and 19th National Conference on Unemployment
Conference Location University of Newcastle
Conference Dates 4-5 December 2013
Place of Publication Callaghan, NSW
Publisher Centre for Full Employment and Equity, The University of Newcastle
Publication Year 2013
Start Page 1
End Page 15
Total Pages 15
HERDC Category E1 - Conference Publication (DIISR)
Abstract The efficacy of the Job Guarantee (JG) as a strategy for sustained full employment has been the subject of ongoing debate between its advocates, who typically align themselves with the principles of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), and other heterodox economists. The latter group have raised issues, including the stabilisation of inflation, balance of payments constraints, political and intellectual constraints, invisible under-employment, and the sustainability of full employment.

The focus of this paper is on the achievement and maintenance of full employment through the adoption of a JG in comparison to pump priming, which is advocated by a number of progressive economists. In particular, it is generally recognised that a reduced rate of growth of capacity during a recession can cause capacity constrained unemployment in the recovery which would be exacerbated if there was a significant pro-cyclical labour supply response, in addition to labour force increases driven by the rising working age population. Consequently an expansion in spending may have an insignificant real effect on employment and output and is likely to impact on inflation. In other words, the real output gap, which relief from the high unemployment is defined as the actual level of output minus potential output associated with the full utilisation of existing capacity, is not large enough to allow all the unemployed to gain productive jobs in the private sector.

We shall argue that, while private sector investment, which is governed by profitability considerations, may be insufficient to expand potential output sufficiently in a recovery to re-absorb the unemployed who lost their jobs in the downturn, this contention does not apply to a currency-issuing government which introduces a JG. While a major planning exercise is required, when the JG is first implemented, which must address the prevailing rate of labour underutilisation, the creation of additional JG jobs simultaneously creates the extra productive capacity required for program viability. On the other hand, the prospective fluctuations in JG employment arising from the fluctuations in non-government employment are likely to be relatively modest within a fully employed economy, which makes the planning process less challenging.

Additional Notes Working Paper No. 04-13
Description for Link Link to published version
Link to publisher homepage

© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact

Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 161 Abstract Views, 239 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 07 Aug 2014, 16:41:05 CST