Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Designing environmental research for impact

Campbell, Andrew, Lefroy, E. C., Caddy-Retalic, Stefan, Bax, Nic, Doherty, P. J., Douglas, Michael M., Johnson, D., Possingham, Hugh P., Spech, A., Tarte, D. and West, J. (2015). Designing environmental research for impact. Science of the Total Environment,534(November):4-13.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 40
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 84376995xPUB148
Title Designing environmental research for impact
Author Campbell, Andrew
Lefroy, E. C.
Caddy-Retalic, Stefan
Bax, Nic
Doherty, P. J.
Douglas, Michael M.
Johnson, D.
Possingham, Hugh P.
Spech, A.
Tarte, D.
West, J.
Journal Name Science of the Total Environment
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 534
Issue Number November
eISSN 1879-1026
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84940436702
Start Page 4
End Page 13
Total Pages 10
Place of Publication Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier BV
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Transdisciplinary research, involving close collaboration between researchers and the users of research, has been a feature of environmental problem solving for several decades, often spurred by the need to find negotiated outcomes to intractable problems. In 2005, the Australian government allocated funding to its environment portfolio for public good research, which resulted in consecutive four-year programmes (Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities, National Environmental Research Program). In April 2014, representatives of the funders, researchers and research users associated with these programmes met to reflect on eight years of experience with these collaborative research models.

This structured reflection concluded that successful multi-institutional transdisciplinary research is necessarily a joint enterprise between funding agencies, researchers and the end users of research. The design and governance of research programmes need to explicitly recognise shared accountabilities among the participants, while respecting the different perspectives of each group. Experience shows that traditional incentive systems for academic researchers, current trends in public sector management, and loose organisation of many end users, work against sustained transdisciplinary research on intractable problems, which require continuity and adaptive learning by all three parties. The likelihood of research influencing and improving environmental policy and management is maximised when researchers, funders and research users have shared goals; there is sufficient continuity of personnel to build trust and sustain dialogue throughout the research process from issue scoping to application of findings; and there is sufficient flexibility in the funding, structure and operation of transdisciplinary research initiatives to enable the enterprise to assimilate and respond to new knowledge and situations.
Keywords Transdisciplinary
Multi-Institutional
Participatory
Flexible
Collaborative
Knowledge Management
Research Strategy
Knowlege brokering
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.089   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Additional Notes Accepted version - pages 1-23.
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 63 Abstract Views, 11 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 01 Dec 2014, 11:52:34 CST by Marion Farram