Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Community preferences for the allocation and donation of organs - The PAraDOx study

Howard, Kirsten, Jan, Stephen, Rose, John, Chadban, Steven, Allen, Richard D. M., Irving, Michelle, Tong, Allison, Wong, Germaine, Craig, Jonathan C. and Cass, Alan (2011). Community preferences for the allocation and donation of organs - The PAraDOx study. BMC Public Health,11(386):1-7.

Document type: Journal Article

IRMA ID 84473293xPUB35
Title Community preferences for the allocation and donation of organs - The PAraDOx study
Author Howard, Kirsten
Jan, Stephen
Rose, John
Chadban, Steven
Allen, Richard D. M.
Irving, Michelle
Tong, Allison
Wong, Germaine
Craig, Jonathan C.
Cass, Alan
Journal Name BMC Public Health
Publication Date 2011
Volume Number 11
Issue Number 386
ISSN 1471-2458   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-80054860924
Start Page 1
End Page 7
Total Pages 7
Place of Publication United Kingdom
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd.
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract
Background
Transplantation is the treatment of choice for people with severe organ failure. However, demand substantially exceeds supply of suitable organs; consequently many people wait months, or years to receive an organ. Reasons for the chronic shortage of deceased organ donations are unclear; there appears to be no lack of 'in principle' public support for organ donation.

Methods/Design
The PAraDOx Study examines community preferences for organ donation policy in Australia. The aims are to 1) determine which factors influence decisions by individuals to offer their organs for donation and 2) determine the criteria by which the community deems the allocation of donor organs to be fair and equitable. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation.

Focus group participants from the general community, aged between 18-80, will be purposively sampled to ensure a variety of cultural backgrounds and views on organ donation. Each focus group will include a ranking exercise using a modified nominal group technique. Focus groups of organ recipients, their families, and individuals on a transplant waiting list will also be conducted.

Using the qualitative work, a discrete choice study will be designed to quantitatively assess community preferences. Discrete choice methods are based on the premise that goods and services can be described in terms of a number of separate attributes. Respondents are presented with a series of choices where levels of attributes are varied, and a mathematical function is estimated to describe numerically the value respondents attach to different options. Two community surveys will be conducted in approximately 1000 respondents each to assess community preferences for organ donation and allocation. A mixed logit model will be used; model results will be expressed as parameter estimates (β) and the odds of choosing one option over an alternative. Trade-offs between attributes will also be calculated.

Discussion

By providing a better understanding of current community preferences in relation to organ donation and allocation, the PAraDOx study will highlight options for firstly, increasing the rate of organ donation and secondly, allow for more transparent and equitable policies in relation to organ allocation.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-386   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 7 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 24 Feb 2015, 12:30:35 CST