Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Overcoming inconsistencies in placement assessment: The case for developmental assessment centers

Sturre, Vanessa, Von Treuer, Kathryn, Keele, Sophie M. and Moss, Simon A. (2012). Overcoming inconsistencies in placement assessment: The case for developmental assessment centers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education,13(2):65-76.

Document type: Journal Article
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Moss_44413.pdf Published version application/pdf 553.99KB 55
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

IRMA ID 83393865xPUB159
Title Overcoming inconsistencies in placement assessment: The case for developmental assessment centers
Author Sturre, Vanessa
Von Treuer, Kathryn
Keele, Sophie M.
Moss, Simon A.
Journal Name Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education
Publication Date 2012
Volume Number 13
Issue Number 2
ISSN 1175-2882   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84873887545
Start Page 65
End Page 76
Total Pages 12
Place of Publication New Zealand
Publisher AsiaPacific Journal of Cooperative Education
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Placements are integral to many university courses and to increasing student employability skills. Nevertheless, several complications, such as the assessment of placement experiences which often go against the principles of procedural justice, may limit placement effectiveness. For example, procedures are not applied uniformly across students; and evaluations of intangible qualities are susceptible to biases. As a result, effort and learning can be compromised. This paper advocates the use of developmental assessment centers to help solve these shortcomings. Developmental assessment centers are often used in organizations to evaluate capabilities of individuals and to facilitate development. Participants complete a series of work related and standardized tasks. Multiple raters then utilize a systematic approach to evaluate participants on a range of competencies, and consequently present constructive feedback to facilitate learning. Therefore, developmental assessment center principles match the key determinants of procedural justice and thus overcome many problems with traditional placement assessments.
Keywords Assessment and developmental centers
Employability
Formative assessment
Placements
Student development
Procedural justice
Description for Link Link to published version
URL http://www.apjce.org/files/APJCE_13_2_65_76.pdf


© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact digitisation@cdu.edu.au.

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 41 Abstract Views, 55 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 24 Feb 2015, 12:40:58 CST