Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Governance and Land Management Fires Understanding Objects of Governance as Expressing an Ethics of Dissensus

Verran, Helen (2015). Governance and Land Management Fires Understanding Objects of Governance as Expressing an Ethics of Dissensus. Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts,(15):52-59.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Verran_44870.pdf Published version application/pdf 242.91KB 249
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

IRMA ID 84278914xPUB21
Title Governance and Land Management Fires Understanding Objects of Governance as Expressing an Ethics of Dissensus
Author Verran, Helen
Journal Name Learning Communities: International Journal of Learning in Social Contexts
Publication Date 2015
Issue Number 15
ISSN 1329-1440   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 52
End Page 59
Total Pages 8
Place of Publication Darwin, NT, Australia
Publisher Social Partnerships in Learning Research Consortium - Learning Research Group, Charles Darwin University
Language English
1604 - Human Geography
160403 - Social and Cultural Geography
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Having worked in science studies for many years, objects of knowledge are my usual focus of analysis. In particular in the past I have puzzled about how the objects that scientists know, and objects that practitioners of Aboriginal Australian knowledge traditions know, might be connected and separated. One example of that analytic work involved analysing the objects of knowledge involved as scientists and Aboriginal landowners engaged with each other around land management firing (Verran, 2002a).

In 2014 I find that the character of the entity that is my focus of analysis must change. Epistemic practices as such, are no longer of much interest to those who fund research in Australia. Nowadays it is objects of governance that are of interest. Of course objects of governance come to life as knowable in knowledge practices, but it is not their capacity to constitute enough certainty about the world known that matters nowadays. It is their role in allowing transparent organisational accountability that now matters. And that shift is accompanied by changed institutional arrangements. Research associated with services provision is now largely the order of the day in Australian universities. Thus it is that, near the end of my career, I find myself working in ‘GroundUP,’ a research group and a services provider located in a policy research unit in Charles Darwin University (see Charles Darwin University’s webpage www. No longer a field worker, I am a story-teller who worries at coming up with some useful naming’s of what we are doing in our ground-up policy research and services delivery projects.
Keywords Objects of governance
Land management
Environmental science
DOI   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Additional Notes This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Description for Link Link to CC Attribution 4.0 License
Link to publisher site

© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact

Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 240 Abstract Views, 249 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 01 May 2015, 15:53:19 CST by Belinda Snell