Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Resource allocation and storage relative to resprouting ability in wind disturbed coastal forest trees

Nzunda, E, Griffiths, Megan and Lawes, Michael (2014). Resource allocation and storage relative to resprouting ability in wind disturbed coastal forest trees. Evolutionary Ecology,28(4):735-749.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus Article

Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 84376995xPUB38
Title Resource allocation and storage relative to resprouting ability in wind disturbed coastal forest trees
Author Nzunda, E
Griffiths, Megan
Lawes, Michael
Journal Name Evolutionary Ecology
Publication Date 2014
Volume Number 28
Issue Number 4
ISSN 0269-7653   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84901836678
Start Page 735
End Page 749
Total Pages 15
Place of Publication Netherlands
Publisher Springer Netherlands
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Many plants persist by resprouting after disturbance. However, the benefits of resprouting (survival) may be traded off against height growth and reproduction. Resources (total non-structural carbohydrates—TNC) that could be allocated to growth or reproduction are stored or mobilised to support resprouting. TNC may either be stored by accumulation where availability exceeds the requirements for growth, or by reserve formation when storage is at the expense of growth. Thus, the mechanism of storage and resource allocation may differ between good (R+) and poor (R−) resprouters in response to nutrient availability and disturbance regime. R+ species typically reserve resources to ensure a rapid resprouting response to disturbance. We test whether R+ and R− species in coastal forest, under chronic wind disturbance, differ in growth rates, biomass allocation, leaf traits, water relations and storage of TNC. Seedlings from three confamilial pairs of R+ and R− tree species were subjected to nitrogen addition, water stress and clipping (simulating herbivory) treatments under greenhouse conditions. R− species had greater height growth rates, larger specific leaf area, lower root mass ratio and lower root TNC than R+ species. These differences between R+ and R− species were maintained irrespective of the levels of nitrogen, water and clipping treatments. R+ species did not increase their TNC concentration under nutrient and water stress, indicating that TNC is stored by reserve formation. R+ species appeared to trade-off growth against storage, while R− species did not. In R+ species, reserve formation is likely a bet-hedging strategy against occasional strong selection events in addition to chronic wind stress. By trading off height growth for better resprouting ability, good resprouters may be able to persist at more frequently disturbed sites (e.g., dune crests and windward slopes), while poor resprouters that have faster height growth can dominate less disturbed sites.
Keywords Aboveground competition
Disturbance regime
Non-structural carbohydrate reserves
Persistence niche
Regeneration strategies
DOI   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 57 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 19 Aug 2015, 12:05:00 CST