Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Northern Australia, a land of diversity

McRobb, Evan, Kaestli, Mirjam, Price, Erin P., Sarovich, Derek s., Mayo, Mark, Warner, Jeffrey, Spratt, Brian G. and Currie, Bart J. (2014). Distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Northern Australia, a land of diversity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,80(11):3463-3468.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 11436xPUB21
Title Distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Northern Australia, a land of diversity
Author McRobb, Evan
Kaestli, Mirjam
Price, Erin P.
Sarovich, Derek s.
Mayo, Mark
Warner, Jeffrey
Spratt, Brian G.
Currie, Bart J.
Journal Name Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Publication Date 2014
Volume Number 80
Issue Number 11
ISSN 0099-2240   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84899883298
Start Page 3463
End Page 3468
Total Pages 6
Place of Publication Washington, United States
Publisher American Society for Microbiology
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative soil bacillus that is the etiological agent of melioidosis and a biothreat agent. Little is known about the biogeography of this bacterium in Australia, despite its hyperendemicity in the northern region of this continent. The population structure of 953 Australian B. pseudomallei strains representing 779 and 174 isolates of clinical and environmental origins, respectively, was analyzed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Bayesian population structure and network SplitsTree analyses were performed on concatenated MLST loci, and sequence type (ST) diversity and evenness were examined using Simpson's and Pielou's indices and a multivariate dissimilarity matrix. Bayesian analysis found two B. pseudomallei populations in Australia that were geographically distinct; isolates from the Northern Territory were grouped mainly into the first population, whereas the majority of isolates from Queensland were grouped in a second population. Differences in ST evenness were observed between sampling areas, confirming that B. pseudomallei is widespread and established across northern Australia, with a large number of fragmented habitats. ST analysis showed that B. pseudomallei populations diversified as the sampling area increased. This observation was in contrast to smaller sampling areas where a few STs predominated, suggesting that B. pseudomallei populations are ecologically established and not frequently dispersed. Interestingly, there was no identifiable ST bias between clinical and environmental isolates, suggesting the potential for all culturable B. pseudomallei isolates to cause disease. Our findings have important implications for understanding the ecology of B. pseudomallei in Australia and for potential source attribution of this bacterium in the event of unexpected cases of melioidosis.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00128-14   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 23 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 19 Aug 2015, 12:11:08 CST