Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Parental Tdap Boosters and Infant Pertussis: A Case-Control Study

Quinn, Helen E., Snelling, Thomas L., Habig, Andrew, Chiu, Clayton, Spokes, Paula J. and McIntyre, Peter B. (2014). Parental Tdap Boosters and Infant Pertussis: A Case-Control Study. Pediatrics,134(4):713-720.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 39
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 75039815xPUB575
Title Parental Tdap Boosters and Infant Pertussis: A Case-Control Study
Author Quinn, Helen E.
Snelling, Thomas L.
Habig, Andrew
Chiu, Clayton
Spokes, Paula J.
McIntyre, Peter B.
Journal Name Pediatrics
Publication Date 2014
Volume Number 134
Issue Number 4
ISSN 0031-4005   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 713
End Page 720
Total Pages 8
Place of Publication United States of America
Publisher American Academy of Pediatrics
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Although recommended for almost a decade, evidence for field effectiveness of vaccinating close adult contacts of newborn infants against pertussis (“cocooning”) is lacking. We evaluated the impact of a government-funded cocoon program during a pertussis epidemic in New South Wales, Australia.
METHODS:
We matched all New South Wales laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases aged <4 months with onset between April 1, 2009, to March 30, 2011 to controls from the state birth register by date of birth and area of residence. Parental vaccine receipt was by self-report, with a subset verified. Parents were considered “immunized” if vaccinated ≥4 weeks before case symptom onset. The effectiveness of parental immunization (versus neither vaccinated) was quantified as (1 – odds ratio) × 100%.
RESULTS:
Case households had fewer immunized mothers (22% vs 32%) or fathers (20% vs 31%) but were more likely to include additional and older children. After adjustment, when both parents met our definition of immunized, risk of pertussis at<4 months of age was reduced by 51% (95% confidence interval 10% to 73%). Maternal vaccination prepregnancy and an immunized father reduced the risk by 51% (95% confidence interval 0% to 76%).
CONCLUSIONS:
Timely parental pertussis boosters provided significant protection. Evidence of protection from maternal vaccination prepregnancy is biologically plausible, and more precise data on the magnitude and duration of this is important for future policy recommendations.

Keywords Pertussis
Vaccine
Effectiveness
Cocooning
Immunisation
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1105   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Description for Link Link to publisher's version
URL http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/4/713
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 29 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 19 Aug 2015, 12:18:19 CST