Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Decision-making stress and satisfaction : a cognitive-affective model

Lucas, James Joseph (2015). Decision-making stress and satisfaction : a cognitive-affective model. PhD Thesis, Charles Darwin University.

Document type: Thesis
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Thesis_CDU_55422_Lucas_J.pdf PDF version generated by student application/pdf 4.34MB 88
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

Author Lucas, James Joseph
Title Decision-making stress and satisfaction : a cognitive-affective model
Institution Charles Darwin University
Publication Date 2015-07
Thesis Type PhD
Supervisor Moore, Kate
Subjects PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Abstract Researchers have utilised normative, heuristic, and process approaches to understand people’s decision-making but with less focus on how satisfying these decisions are. There is a gap in the literature regarding the contribution of appraisals, stress, coping, and metacognitive awareness and acceptance to decision satisfaction. The conflict approach to decision-making, cognitive theories of stress and coping, and recent developments in cognitive-behavioural therapies may further our understanding of decision satisfaction. A Cognitive-Affective Model of Decision-Making Stress and Satisfaction was developed from the literature and tested in a three-phase longitudinal study. In Phase One (n = 182 adults; Mage = 40.48 years; SD = 12.04), a modified model focusing on a decision related to participants’ occupation or study was supported. It explained 61% of the variance in participants’ decision satisfaction. In Phase Two (n = 84; Mage = 39.43 years, SD = 11.94), the model was found to be invariant across a family/relationship decision. In Phase Three (n = 54; Mage = 39.54 years; SD = 12.29), model replication was not feasible although mean differences in the model’s manifest factors across occupation/study, family/relationship, and physical/mental health decision types were small or not significant, suggesting that the model is potentially invariant across all three decision types. The Cognitive-Affective Model of Decision-Making Stress and Satisfaction has both theoretical and practical implications for clinicians and researchers alike. These implications are discussed together with the thesis’ limitations and avenues for future research.
Open access True


© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact digitisation@cdu.edu.au.

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 88 Abstract Views, 88 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 20 May 2016, 12:09:30 CST by Jessie Ng