Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Quality Assurance, Standards and Accreditation University Courses in Exercise and Sport Science in Australia: Processes and Outcomes

Heazlewood, Ian (2015). Quality Assurance, Standards and Accreditation University Courses in Exercise and Sport Science in Australia: Processes and Outcomes. In: 7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain, 6-8 July 2015.

Document type: Conference Paper
Citation counts: Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 84377429xPUB127
Author Heazlewood, Ian
Title Quality Assurance, Standards and Accreditation University Courses in Exercise and Sport Science in Australia: Processes and Outcomes
Conference Name 7th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies
Conference Location Barcelona, Spain
Conference Dates 6-8 July 2015
Conference Publication Title EDULEARN15 Proceedings
Publisher IATED Academy
Publication Year 2015
ISBN 978-84-606-8243-1   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
ISSN 2340-1117   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 3962
End Page 3968
Total Pages 7
HERDC Category E1 - Conference Publication (DIISR)
Abstract Australian higher education ‘industry’ is a highly regulated environment and represents the fourth largest export income contributing 14.385 billion dollars in 2012/2013 and why the Australian Government has placed itself in a significant role in regulating and protecting the industry. The current regulatory model is a top down approach where Australian Government legislation controls the criteria for quality assurance, standards and accreditation. Specifically via TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011), which sets the higher education standards framework, risk assessment framework, register of experts, engagement with professional bodies, TEQSA quality assurance, TEQSA public reporting and compliance with other standards such as the AQF (Australian Qualifications Framework). The AQF “is the national policy for regulated qualifications in Australian education and training. It incorporates the qualifications from each education and training sector into a single comprehensive national qualifications framework,” and sets the criteria for each level of qualification from Level 1 - Certificate 1 to Level 10 - doctoral degree. In this context Australian universities and qualifications are, especially in exercise and sport science undergraduate degrees, converging to become homogeneous entities. In one context promoting comparability and transferability of graduates between states and in another context the construct of promoting diversity while compelling conformity or education convergence in the name of quality assurance, standards and accreditation. At the intra university level each university must comply with the national guidelines in term of mapping criteria with actual course. Universities within Australia can gain self-accrediting status, which essentially means they can accredit their own degrees. This concept is somewhat a misnomer as it is driven by national government compliance. This is a challenge as first, second and third year units/subjects have to be mapped with competencies consistent with the level of academic year re compliance standards. The quality assurance, standards and accreditation at this step in the process is driven by processes within the university and are dependent on such constructs as course advisory groups, school, faculty and university learning and teaching committees and associated with jumping of administrative hurdles. In addition to these Australian Government drivers in higher education the internal university drivers’ professional societies/associations in exercise and sport science are playing a significant role to influence exercise and sport science curricula at the national level. The level of influence extends to micromanagement of the total curriculum and to the content and skills expected at the level of individual unit/subject. Such compliance may involve responding to multiple criteria as staff numbers, qualifications, staff publication outputs, professional associations staff are expected to belong to, dictating library holdings, size and diversity of teaching and research infrastructure and exact content areas to be covered in units and courses. The result developing higher education/university courses in Australia today is satisfying criteria of external stakeholders, the economic rationalists (government) and the self-perceived knowledge controllers (professional associations) and not necessarily the universities, “the self-accrediting entity.”
Keyword Accreditation
Standards
Quality
Description for Link Link to conference proceedings
URL https://library.iated.org/view/HEAZLEWOOD2015QUA
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 6 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 12:11:26 CST