Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Measuring benefits of protected area management: Trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems

Adams, Vanessa M., Setterfield, Samantha A., Douglas, Michael M., Kennard, Mark J. and Ferdinands, Keith B. (2015). Measuring benefits of protected area management: Trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,370(1681):1-12.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 4
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 81144320xPUB142
Title Measuring benefits of protected area management: Trends across realms and research gaps for freshwater systems
Author Adams, Vanessa M.
Setterfield, Samantha A.
Douglas, Michael M.
Kennard, Mark J.
Ferdinands, Keith B.
Journal Name Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 370
Issue Number 1681
ISSN 0962-8436   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84944097557
Start Page 1
End Page 12
Total Pages 12
Place of Publication United Kingdom
Publisher The Royal Society Publishing
Field of Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Protected areas remain a cornerstone for global conservation. However, their effectiveness at halting biodiversity decline is not fully understood. Studies of protected area benefits have largely focused on measuring their impact on halting deforestation and have neglected to measure the impacts of protected areas on other threats. Evaluations that measure the impact of protected area management require more complex evaluation designs and datasets. This is the case across realms (terrestrial, freshwater, marine), but measuring the impact of protected area management in freshwater systems may be even more difficult owing to the high level of connectivity and potential for threat propagation within systems (e.g. downstream flow of pollution). We review the potential barriers to conducting impact evaluation for protected area management in freshwater systems. We contrast the barriers identified for freshwater systems to terrestrial systems and discuss potential measurable outcomes and confounders associated with protected area management across the two realms. We identify key research gaps in conducting impact evaluation in freshwater systems that relate to three of their major characteristics: variability, connectivity and time lags in outcomes. Lastly, we use Kakadu National Park world heritage area, the largest national park in Australia, as a case study to illustrate the challenges of measuring impacts of protected area management programmes for environmental outcomes in freshwater systems.
Keywords impact evaluation
protected area management
freshwater ecosystems
Kakadu National Park
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0274   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 4 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 12:35:32 CST