Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

The cost of collaboration: how Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment

Benham, C. F., Beavis, Sara G. and Hussey, Karen E. (2015). The cost of collaboration: how Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management,22(3):285-297.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 83393865xPUB233
Title The cost of collaboration: how Caring for Our Country has shaped regional Natural Resource Management in an Australian river catchment
Author Benham, C. F.
Beavis, Sara G.
Hussey, Karen E.
Journal Name Australasian Journal of Environmental Management
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 22
Issue Number 3
ISSN 1448-6563   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84943518841
Start Page 285
End Page 297
Total Pages 13
Place of Publication United Kingdom
Publisher Taylor & Francis
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Funding arrangements for Natural Resource Management (NRM) in Australia have undergone a number of changes in the last decade, including the transition from the Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) to the Caring for Our Country (CfoC) program (recently merged with Landcare to become the National Landcare Programme). It has been suggested that CfoC eroded some of the gains in regional autonomy, community engagement and goodwill made under the NHT. This article presents the results of research conducted with regional NRM bodies and community-based stakeholders in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, south-eastern Australia. It explores the impacts of the CfoC grants structure on NRM bodies and communities, and examines the practical responses of resource managers to funding constraints. The research demonstrates that the structure of NRM funding delivery under CfoC played a key role in shaping the strategic and operational activities of regional NRM bodies and community groups. In particular, the short-term, single-issue focus of the program placed pressure on collaborations between regional NRM bodies and other groups, and could inhibit strategic and integrated approaches to NRM. At the same time, however, NRM planners and community stakeholders have actively managed the limitations of the CfoC structure to optimise catchment outcomes for communities and the environment.
Keywords Collaboration
Funding
Natural Heritage Trust
NRM
National Landcare Programme
Stakeholders
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2014.976847   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 13 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 12:40:50 CST