Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology

Cristaudo, Wayne (2015). Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology. Filozofija i drustvo,26(1):179-204.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Cristaudo_59383.pdf Published version application/pdf 193.25KB 6
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

IRMA ID 84279116xPUB358
Title Speech, time and suffering: Rosenstock-Huessy’s Post-Goethean, Post-Christian sociology
Author Cristaudo, Wayne
Journal Name Filozofija i drustvo
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 26
Issue Number 1
ISSN 0353-5738   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 179
End Page 204
Total Pages 26
Place of Publication Beograd, Serbia
Publisher nstitut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju Beograd
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Abstract Five years ago, a new three volume edition of Eugen Rosenstock- Huessy (to translate) In the Cross of Reality: A Post-Goethean Sociology appeared in Germany. As with the two prior editions of the work (a one volume version in 1925, and a much revised and expanded two volume version 1956/8) it met with almost no critical response. This is perhaps not surprising - and it barely mentions any other sociologists, its approach is highly idiosyncratic, it is as much anthropology and history as it is sociology. Indeed, the second and third volumes mainly focus on the social formations of antiquity, and the role of Christianity and the messianic revolutions of the last millennium in creating a universal history. In this paper I take the relationship between speech, time and suffering as the key to Rosenstock-Huessy’s argument for why a theoretical grasp of Christianity as a social power is so important for social theory, and why he sees Sociology as a post-Christian form of knowledge. I also make the case for why Rosenstock-Huessy is an interesting and important social theorist.
Keywords Names
Tribes
Empires
City-States
Israelites
Christianity
Revolutions
Post-Christian
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/FID1501179C   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)


© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact digitisation@cdu.edu.au.

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 11 Abstract Views, 6 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 12:58:39 CST