Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

King, Alison J., Gawne, Ben, Beesley, Leah, Koehn, John D., Nielsen, Daryl and Price, Amina (2015). Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows. Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors,55(5):991-1005.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 2
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 84376995xPUB193
Title Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows
Author King, Alison J.
Gawne, Ben
Beesley, Leah
Koehn, John D.
Nielsen, Daryl
Price, Amina
Journal Name Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 55
Issue Number 5
ISSN 0364-152X   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84937763571
Start Page 991
End Page 1005
Total Pages 15
Place of Publication United Kingdom
Publisher Dalton Communications
Field of Research 0502 - Environmental Science and Management
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility.
Keywords Environmental water
River restoration
Conceptual models
Adaptive management
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 13 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 12:59:43 CST