Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Improving policy efficiency and effectiveness to save more species: A case study of the megadiverse country Australia

McDonald, Jane A., Carwardine, Josie, Joseph, Liana N., Klein, Carissa J., Rout, Tracy M., Watson, James E.M., Garnett, Stephen T., McCarthy, Michael A. and Possingham, Hugh P. (2015). Improving policy efficiency and effectiveness to save more species: A case study of the megadiverse country Australia. Biological Conservation,182:102-108.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 18
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 84376995xPUB109
Title Improving policy efficiency and effectiveness to save more species: A case study of the megadiverse country Australia
Author McDonald, Jane A.
Carwardine, Josie
Joseph, Liana N.
Klein, Carissa J.
Rout, Tracy M.
Watson, James E.M.
Garnett, Stephen T.
McCarthy, Michael A.
Possingham, Hugh P.
Journal Name Biological Conservation
Publication Date 2015
Volume Number 182
ISSN 0006-3207   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84949116601
Start Page 102
End Page 108
Total Pages 7
Place of Publication Netherlands
Publisher Elsevier BV
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DIISR)
Abstract Native flora and fauna species continue to decline in the megadiverse, wealthy, economically and politically stable nation of Australia despite current efforts in policy and management. Ongoing research is examining these declines, their causes and the adequacy of current policy, but strategies for improving the outcomes for threatened species have attracted less attention. We discuss several key aspects of Australia’s national threatened species management approach that potentially hinder the efficiency and effectiveness of management: the threatened species listing process is lengthy and biased; recovery plan development is resource intensive, restricted to a subset of species and often not effective; funding for threatened species management is not allocated efficiently or transparently; and management is not designed to incorporate uncertainties and adapt to changing future threats. Based on these issues we recommend four changes to current process: rationalize listing and assessment processes; develop approaches to prioritize species-based and threat-based responses cost-effectively; estimate funds required to recover species and secure longer term funding; and accommodate uncertainties and new threats into the current planning framework. Cost-effective prioritization for species and threats identifies which actions are likely to achieve the greatest benefits to species per unit cost, thereby managing more species and threats with available funds. These improvements can be made without legislative reform, additional funding or socio-economic shifts. If implemented, we believe more Australian threatened species will benefit from current efforts. Many of the challenges facing Australia are analogous to issues in other countries including the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom and these recommendations could assist in improving threatened species management.
Keywords Endangered species
Threatened species
DOI   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 137 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 26 Jul 2016, 13:01:56 CST