Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Is relative abundance a good indicator of population size? Evidence from fragmented populations of a specialist butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Collier, Neil, Mackay, Duncan A. and Benkendorff, Kirsten (2008). Is relative abundance a good indicator of population size? Evidence from fragmented populations of a specialist butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Population Ecology,50(1):17-23.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID 73090377xPUB6
Title Is relative abundance a good indicator of population size? Evidence from fragmented populations of a specialist butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
Author Collier, Neil
Mackay, Duncan A.
Benkendorff, Kirsten
Journal Name Population Ecology
Publication Date 2008
Volume Number 50
Issue Number 1
ISSN 1438-3896   (check CDU catalogue  open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 17
End Page 23
Total Pages 7
Place of Publication Japan
Publisher Springer Japan
Field of Research 0602 - Ecology
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract A common task for conservation biologists and ecologists is to establish how many individuals there are in a population, usually within a defined area of habitat. Estimates of both absolute and relative population sizes are widely used in many aspects of population conservation and management. Mark–recapture studies are appropriate for estimating the absolute population sizes of a wide range of animals, in both open and closed populations, while relative abundances can be estimated from a variety of survey methods. Relative abundances are often used in a comparative way to compare both population size and fluctuations in abundance. Here, we used transect counts and capture–recapture studies to estimate the relative abundances and population sizes of a specialist butterfly, Theclinesthes albocincta (Lycaenidae) in three habitat fragments, over two consecutive years. The sizes of the three populations differed significantly between sites and were highly variable between years. One population was extremely small and is likely to become locally extinct. We found that estimates of relative abundance were highly correlated with estimates of population size (r 2 = 0.88, P = 0.017) derived from the open population models. The combination of transect counts and capture–recapture studies used in this study appears to be a very informative tool for the conservation and management of this butterfly species and could be extended to other insects.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10144-007-0056-2   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 61 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 01 May 2009, 13:31:23 CST by Sarena Wegener