Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap

Knight, A, Cowling, R, Rouget, M, Balmford, A, Lombard, A and Campbell, B (2008). Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology,22(3):610-617.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts: Scopus Citation Count Cited 159 times in Scopus Article | Citations
Altmetric Score Altmetric Score is 25
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar

IRMA ID A00002xPUB44
Title Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap
Author Knight, A
Cowling, R
Rouget, M
Balmford, A
Lombard, A
Campbell, B
Journal Name Conservation Biology
Publication Date 2008
Volume Number 22
Issue Number 3
ISSN 0888-8892   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-44949262031
Start Page 610
End Page 617
Total Pages 8
Place of Publication US
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing
Field of Research 0502 - Environmental Science and Management
0602 - Ecology
0799 - Other Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract Conservation assessment is a rapidly evolving discipline whose stated goal is the design of networks of protected areas that represent and ensure the persistence of nature (i.e., species, habitats, and environmental processes) by separating priority areas from the activities that degrade or destroy them. Nevertheless, despite a burgeoning scientific literature that ever refines these techniques for allocating conservation resources, it is widely believed that conservation assessments are rarely translated into actions that actually conserve nature. We reviewed the conservation assessment literature in peer-reviewed journals and conducted survey questionnaires of the authors of these studies. Two-thirds of conservation assessments published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature do not deliver conservation action, primarily because most researchers never plan for implementation. This research–implementation gap between conservation science and real-world action is a genuine phenomenon and is a specific example of the "knowing–doing gap" that is widely recognized in management science. Given the woefully inadequate resources allocated for conservation, our findings raise questions over the utility of conservation assessment science, as currently practiced, to provide useful, pragmatic solutions to conservation planning problems. A reevaluation of the conceptual and operational basis of conservation planning research is urgently required. We recommend the following actions for beginning a process for bridging the research–implementation gap in conservation planning: (1) acknowledge the research–implementation gap is real, (2) source research questions from practitioners, (3) situate research within a broader conservation planning model, (4) expand the social dimension of conservation assessments, (5) support conservation plans with transdisciplinary social learning institutions, (6) reward academics for societal engagement and implementation, and (7) train students in skills for "doing" conservation.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00914.x   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 102 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 11 May 2009, 14:15:59 CST by Sarena Wegener