Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

CDU Staff and Student only

Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling

Stevens, Matthew and Young, M. (2010). Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,26(1):89-103.

Document type: Journal Article

IRMA ID 10019xPUB5
Title Who Plays What? Participation Profiles in Chance Versus Skill-based Gambling
Author Stevens, Matthew
Young, M.
Journal Name Journal of Gambling Studies
Publication Date 2010
Year Available 2009
Volume Number 26
Issue Number 1
ISSN 1573-3602   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 89
End Page 103
Total Pages 15
Place of Publication Netherlands
Publisher Springer Netherlands
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract To determine whether gambling participation falls into skill and chance-based categories and, if so, to determine the socio-demographic characteristics associated with these different categories. A cross-sectional analysis of all respondents to the 2005 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence Survey who gambled in the 12 months prior to the survey. Factor analysis was employed to determine whether a chance versus skill-based dichotomy described the structure of gambling participation. Gambler preference groups were constructed using the median of rotated factor scores. Multinomial logit regression was then used to determine independent associations between explanatory variables and categories of gambler preferences. The skill and chance-based dichotomy did describe player preferences for the sample of adult gamblers in the Northern Territory, Australia. Gender, age, household income, household structure and the geographic location (access to gambling opportunities) of respondents were all associated with different degrees of participation in skill and chance based gambling activities. Notably, respondents 35 years and over were significantly over-represented in the low-skill/high-chance participation group, and under-represented in the high-skill/low-chance group. It is clear that the term gambling is a confounding rubric that hides differences both in the type of activity and the socio-demographic profiles of participants. An examination of the latter raises important questions about the role of chance in later life, as well as the role of self-determination in gambling for other groups, particularly younger men.
Keywords chance
socioeconomic status
DOI   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 143 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 24 Feb 2010, 09:44:37 CST