Charles Darwin University

CDU eSpace
Institutional Repository

 
CDU Staff and Student only
 

Does implementation of a paediatric asthma clinical practice guideline worksheet change clinical practice?

Gildenhuys, Johann, Lee, Mark and Isbister, Geoffrey K. (2009). Does implementation of a paediatric asthma clinical practice guideline worksheet change clinical practice?. International Journal of Emergency Medicine,2(1):33-39.

Document type: Journal Article
Citation counts:
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Attached Files (Some files may be inaccessible until you login with your CDU eSpace credentials)
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
Download this reading Isbister_8341.pdf Published version application/pdf 293.55KB 38
Reading the attached file works best in Firefox, Chrome and IE 9 or later.

Title Does implementation of a paediatric asthma clinical practice guideline worksheet change clinical practice?
Author Gildenhuys, Johann
Lee, Mark
Isbister, Geoffrey K.
Journal Name International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publication Date 2009
Volume Number 2
Issue Number 1
ISSN 1865-1380   (check CDU catalogue open catalogue search in new window)
Start Page 33
End Page 39
Total Pages 7
Place of Publication Heidelberg, Germany
Publisher Springer Open
HERDC Category C1 - Journal Article (DEST)
Abstract Background: Despite the development of evidence-based practice guidelines in many countries for asthma treatment in children, there is limited evidence that using such guidelines improves patient care. Aims: Our aim was to evaluate whether the implementation of an evidence-based asthma clinical practice guideline (CPG) worksheet changes clinical practice.

Methods: The study was a before and after study of the implementation of a paediatric asthma CPG in a tertiary paediatric emergency department (ED). All children aged 2–16 years who had a diagnosis of asthma were included. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective chart review for time periods before (May to September 2003) and after (May to September 2005) the introduction of the CPG worksheet. Primary outcomes were: use of spacers for salbutamol instead of nebulisers, use of ipratropium and use of corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes were use of an ED action plan, ordering chest X-rays (CXR) and admission rate.

Results: Before implementation, 240 children presented with asthma and after implementation, 286 children presented. The two groups had similar ages, asthma severity, admission respiratory rate (RR) and oxygen saturation. Following implementation there was an increase in spacer use from 17 to 26% [+9%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2–16%; p = 0.015] and a reduction in ipratropium use from 58 to 44% (−13%; 95% CI: −22 to −5%; p = 0.0029). The proportion of patients treated with corticosteroids did not change. The number of patients with an ED action plan increased. The number of CXR ordered decreased and the hospital admission rate decreased.

Conclusions:
The study demonstrates that implementation of an asthma CPG worksheet in a tertiary paediatric ED resulted in modest changes in clinical practice, mainly by increasing clinician adherence to the guidelines.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-008-0063-x   (check subscription with CDU E-Gateway service for CDU Staff and Students  check subscription with CDU E-Gateway in new window)


© copyright

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in CDU eSpace. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact digitisation@cdu.edu.au.

 
Versions
Version Filter Type
Access Statistics: 68 Abstract Views, 39 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 24 Feb 2010, 10:44:32 CST